27 Feb
2008
27 Feb
'08
12:56 p.m.
El Wednesday 27 February 2008 11:41:20 Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió:
Sure, anyway the exact changes to the RFC 3261 appear
in the Section 8 of
the above draft.
Hi again Bogdan.
After this could you please explain which is the exact behaviour of OpenSer in
those issues?
For example:
- OpenSer keeps INVITE transaction info after 200 OK like suggested in the
draft, is it? I'm sure it does it since a late INVITE retransmision is not
forwarded to destination if a 200 OK was already received by OpenSer.
- In "tm" mode, does OpenSer forward upstream responses not matching
transaction? In case OpenSer drop them, its behaviour is the suggested in the
draft.
Thanks a lot.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es