15 Apr
2005
15 Apr
'05
3:43 p.m.
Hi All.
I think the entire ser community would agree that this is not really the
best way to manage external connectivity to ser. It's just a maintenance
nightmare - so an abstraction layer is desperately needed.
I'm also have the opinion that the FIFO needs to be phased out and
completely replaced with a real network server.
Just my $0.02 worth.
Regards,
Paul
On 4/15/05, Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com> wrote:
Marian Dumitru writes:
similar to FIFO interface, there is a UNIX socket
one. Also I saw posted
recently a patch for UDP/TCP sockets, but haven't tried yet.
i tried it and it worked ok for some functions and not for some others.
also, it currently doesn't support an allowed clients file or database
table.
there is something wrong in the design of external access to ser.
an abstraction layer is missing between modules and external access
methods. so each module has to currently support fifo, unix
socket, and also tcp/udp interface.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers