Below are my personal opinions on the open issues I listed.
I try here to identify open issues not
discussed/decided:
* Should there be one TB for all
iptel.org projects or one TB for each?
I'm not
sure what I think here. I see pros and cons.
* What should be the criteria for selecting people on
the TB (if any)?
I think everybody should be allowed to put forward names.
* Who have voting rights when we vote on candidates
for the TB?
Hopefully we can agree to a set of good candidates without resorting to
formal voting, but if there is disagreement about controversial
candidate(s), I think maybe those with CVS write access should be
allowed to vote.
* What should be the term for a TB member?
We
need some continuity, one year seems too short, three years too long.
What about two?
* Should this TB handle any issues beyond development?
(ex. website
content,
iptel.org in the wider SIP context, relationship with other
projects, packaging, longer-term positioning of projects, longer-term
development goals, and so on)
No, I don't think the people on the technical
board will be the best
people for doing such stuff.
* If not, do we need another group that could handle
such things?
Yes, but I don't think this group should have any formal decision
power
and that it thus can be more informally put together?
g-)