Why don't you send SDP in the INVITE message?
Jose Simoes
On 2/1/06, Carla Ares < carla.ares(a)gmail.com > wrote:
Hi all,
> I have a problem with audio, when the destination of a call is
> natted and the other side is public. This problem is cause because the SDP
> info only is present in the 200 OK and in the ACK message.
>
> I'm using ser ( 8.14) with mediaproxy (1.2.1).
>
> I have an H323 to SIP translator (and SIP to H323 too) connected
> to the PSTN and to the SIP Proxy (SER).
> H323 is the origin of the call (public client), and SIP UAC is the
> destination (Natted client).
> My proxy is working in state full mode and has a public IP.
>
> The H323 side is using slow start, so when it starts the
> transaction with an INVITE, it will not send the SDP info (it will send it
> in the ACK message).
> The proxy forwards this message to the destination.
> SIP UAC, starts ringing. When we hooks off, the SIP UAC send an
> 200 OK with SDP message to the H323 side.
>
> This is the 200 OK / SDP that the proxy receives from the SIP
> side.
>
> No. Time Source Destination
> Protocol Info
> 488 28.488811 200.68.89.2 200.68.89.12
> SIP/SDP Status: 200 OK, with session description
> Message body
> Session Description Protocol
> Session Description Protocol Version (v): 0
> Owner/Creator, Session Id (o): 700600 6015 6015 IN IP4
> 192.168.0.101
> Owner Username: 700600
> Session ID: 6015
> Session Version: 6015
> Owner Network Type: IN
> Owner Address Type: IP4
> Owner Address: 192.168.0.101
> Session Name (s): AddPac Gateway SDP
> Connection Information (c): IN IP4 192.168.0.101
> Connection Network Type: IN
> Connection Address Type: IP4
> Connection Address: 192.168.0.101
> Time Description, active time (t): 0 0
> Session Start Time: 0
> Session Stop Time: 0
> Media Description, name and address (m): audio 23018
> RTP/AVP 18 8 0 101
> Media Type: audio
> Media Port: 23018
> Media Proto: RTP/AVP
> Media Format: ITU-T G.729
> Media Format: ITU-T G.711 PCMA
> Media Format: ITU-T G.711 PCMU
> Media Format: 101
>
> Following the ser.cfg, this 200 OK / SDP will make the proxy to
> use mediaproxy (use_media_proxy()), because the destination user is natted.
> So the mediaproxy module, will generate a lookup command to the
> proxydispatcher.py.
>
> proxydispatcher[30535]: command lookup 2281401749(a)200.68.89.10
> 192.168.0.101:23018:audio 200.68.89.2 200.68.89.10 remote
> 200.68.89.10 unknown AddPac=20SIP=20Gateway info=
> from:1150316660@200.68.89.10, to:1152464490@200.68.89.10
> ,fromtag:3512844671,totag:7b07717a4
> proxydispatcher[30535]: warning: trying to lookup session with
> non-existent id: ' 2281401749(a)200.68.89.10'
>
> The proxydispatcher does not recognize that command because it has
> not generate the session before. So, the proxy forwards the 200 OK /SDP
> message without changing the SDP info. When the H323 sides receives that
> info, it thinks that it has to send RTP to the private IP.
>
> Then the H323 sends the ACK with SDP.
>
> Then, we cannot ear audio in both sides.
>
> Here is the problem, because, I didn't receive an INVITE with SDP
> that can create the session into the dispatcher.
>
>
> A is public, B is natted
>
> side A Proxy side B
>
> INVITE without SDP
> ---------->
> 100 Trying
> <----------
>
> INVITE without SDP
> ---------->
>
> 100 Trying
> <----------
> 180 Ringing
> <----------
> 180 Ringing
> <----------
>
> 200 OK SDP (B private IP)
> <----------
> *1*
> 200 OK SDP (B private IP)
> <----------
>
> ACK SDP (A public IP)
> ---------->
> *2*
> ACK SDP (mediaproxy public IP)
> ---------->
>
> ......................................................
> RTP from B
> <----------------------
> *3*
> ......................................................
>
>
> *1* The proxy must replace the private IP of the SDP, with the ip
> of the mediaproxy. The looku prequest does not work, because no session was
> found
> *2* the proxy generates the session in the mediaproxy. So B thinks
> that the RTP must go to the mediaproxy. But A never knows the mediaproxy
> address.
> *3* RTP from A goes to anywhere, because A does not know where it
> is the private adrress of B.
>
>
Do you know a solution to this? Is the sequence of the message all
right?
Regards.
Carla
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers