-----Original Message-----
From: Allan [mailto:voip_tango@yahoo.ca]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 2:33 PM
To: Richard
Subject: RE: [Serusers] Multiple UA behind NAT and SIP Proxy Outside LAN
Thanks Richard,
How would this line look? I have read through the
admin guide a number of times but have not seen how
to do this. How would I actually compare the src_ip
variable with part of the uri?
Regards,
Allan
--- Richard <richard(a)o-matrix.org> wrote:
You can check if the src_ip and the r-uri's
ip
address are the same. Just
make sure this is done after lookup() and before
being forwarded. This
method has lots of limitations. Check the archive
for more discussions. But
most of time it is sufficient.
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org
[mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org]
On
Behalf Of Allan
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 2:08 PM
To: Andris Parra L.; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Multiple UA behind NAT and
SIP Proxy Outside LAN
I am also looking for a way to determine if two
UAs
are behind the same NAT. I have found that if I
do
not force rtp_proxy between two UAs known to be
behind
the same NAT, the call is setup and torn down
through
SER and RTP is sent directly between the two
UAs.
This is how I want to call to operate. I just
can't
see a way via SER's scripting language to
make a
decision based on the src_ip of the initial
request
and a portion of the URI domain, which in my case
is
the IP address of the NAT.
Regards,
Allan
--- "Andris Parra L." <apl_1980b(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
> I4m wondering if there is a way to
comunicate UA
> agents betwen them that are behind the same nat,
> they are working perfectly with the outside
world
> (I4m not having problems with Nat
traversal),
but
> they try to send the RTP and RTCP data to
the
> aparent public IP that they are registered in
the
> Sip Proxy, and of course, the multimedia
data
isn4t
> processed by the router because the
destination
IP
> is the one asigned to the WAN interface of
it
and it
> sees it in the LAN interface.
> I4m thinking that maybe the Sip Proxy (ser 0.14)
> isn4t the problem, maybe the infraestructure is
not
> enough, so, is there anything that you could
answer
> me tha guide me in this scenario?
>
> I4ll be grateful for any information you could
give
> me.
>
>
>
>
> Andris Parra L.
> apl_1980b(a)yahoo.com
> Ipsofactum LTDA.
>
www.ipsofactum.com
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free.
Download
now.>
_______________________________________________
Serusers
mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
______________________________________________________________________
Post your free ad now!