17 Nov
2005
17 Nov
'05
7:05 p.m.
Hi Klaus,
I just committed a fixup for the socket setting in after strict routing
case. Please give it a try and let me know if work properly.
Best regards,
Bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Klaus,
I will have a look on this, but looks to be a problem in RR module -
socket selection. This problem was fixed before the release, but
seams that only for "after loose router" case and not also for "after
strict router" case.
See http://openser.org/pipermail/devel/2005-October/000774.html.
can you switch the CISCO to loose route? just to see if works....
i've tried with x-lite (loose_router) and it worked fine.
in the mean while, please submit a bug report on the tracker.
done
regards,
bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Klaus,
the change of ports on INVITE time should be reflected in double
record routing (with both ports) in order to ensure that the
sequential request will follow the same port path. So, the
question is, can you confirm the double RR in the outgoing INVITE
from openser?
Yes, double RR works fine. As you see in the BYE:
BYE sip:83.136.32.83:5060;r2=on;ftag=a613b273;nat=yes;lr=on SIP/2.0.
Route: <sip:83.136.32.83:6060;r2=on;ftag=a613b273;nat=yes;lr=on>,
<sip:klaus@84.20.167.143:7404>.
both RR are present (Cisco is a strcit router, thus one RR is int eh
request URI, the second one is in the Route header).
Should openser change the sending socket according to the second
Route URI? I've also tried with a loose_router as callee and it
again does not work.
klaus
regards,
bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've configure openser to listen also on port udp:6060. The INVITE
> comes in to 6060, forwarded to other client on port 5060.
> Responses and ACK will be handled correctly - on call leg uses
> port 6060, the other call leg 5050.
>
> If now the callee sends a BYE (Cisco, strict router) the BYE will
> be forwarded from port 5060 instead of 6060. I didn't find a
> problem in the BYE request sent to the openser. Is openser
> behaving wrong here? Or do I have to configure special routing for
> this scenario?
>
> thanks
> klaus
>
> BYE from callee (5060) to proxy
>
> U 2005/11/09 16:47:48.254756 83.136.33.19:5060 -> 83.136.32.83:5060
> BYE sip:83.136.32.83:5060;r2=on;ftag=a613b273;nat=yes;lr=on SIP/2.0.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 83.136.33.19:5060;branch=z9hG4bK3dc73e84.
> From:
> <sip:01505641636@enum.at>;tag=000dedfb04cc011e597bda33-277ea073.
> To: klaus enum.at<sip:klaus@enum.at>;tag=a613b273.
> Call-ID: 7f49f21ed451bb7a.
> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:47:47 GMT.
> CSeq: 101 BYE.
> User-Agent: CSCO/6.
> Content-Length: 0.
> RTP-RxStat: Dur=??,Pkt=??,Oct=??,LatePkt=??,LostPkt=??,AvgJit=??.
> RTP-TxStat: Dur=??,Pkt=??,Oct=??.
> Route: <sip:83.136.32.83:6060;r2=on;ftag=a613b273;nat=yes;lr=on>,
> <sip:klaus@84.20.167.143:7404>.
> .
>
> BYE from proxy to caller: is sent from 5060 althouth it should be
> sent from 6060.
>
> #
> U 2005/11/09 16:47:48.264940 83.136.32.83:5060 -> 84.20.167.143:7404
> BYE sip:klaus@84.20.167.143:7404 SIP/2.0.
> Max-Forwards: 10.
> Record-Route:
> <sip:83.136.32.83;ftag=000dedfb04cc011e597bda33-277ea073;nat=yes;lr=on>.
>
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 83.136.32.83;branch=z9hG4bKaf5b.fbc8b274.0.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 83.136.33.19:5060;branch=z9hG4bK3dc73e84.
> From:
> <sip:01505641636@enum.at>;tag=000dedfb04cc011e597bda33-277ea073.
> To: klaus enum.at<sip:klaus@enum.at>;tag=a613b273.
> Call-ID: 7f49f21ed451bb7a.
> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:47:47 GMT.
> CSeq: 101 BYE.
> User-Agent: CSCO/6.
> Content-Length: 0.
> RTP-RxStat: Dur=??,Pkt=??,Oct=??,LatePkt=??,LostPkt=??,AvgJit=??.
> RTP-TxStat: Dur=??,Pkt=??,Oct=??.
> .
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>