And btw, we have some remaining cleanup in the cvs tree: old text/readme files, config files, copyrights, authors who no longer are authors etc... g-)
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007 at 19:34, Jiri Kuthan jiri@iptel.org wrote:
Steve,
I think it is fair to consider Ottendorf finished. The only important reason (apart from better documentation) for not having declared Ottendorf to be "officially" released is we are conservatively awaiting feedback from some friendly bigger sites which have deployed it. Happily, we have not received complaints so far. I think it will take four more weeks for us to collect critical amount of feedback to feel comfortable declaring the release as "officialy final". For those who are not running 100k subsribers on a box and are not patient enough to wait for more documentation, I can only recommend to go ahead now.
-jiri
I would add that the missing parts are:
- documentation update
- ser libraries building fixes: the libraries fail to build on several
systems (but they build ok on linux and I think on BSDs too). This matters only if you use presence related modules (dialog, pa, rls, presence_b2b, xcap).
- a check to see if all the fixes that made it into unstable after we branched 2.0 were backported (I think some tls stuff might still be missing).
Andrei
At 13:03 27/03/2007, Steve Blair wrote:
Would someone be able to tell me the status of the Ottendorf release? In addition to knowing when the stable release will be available I am also interested in when presence support will be available.
Thanks,Steve _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers