OK, that means the flag was set when SER called save("location").
Jan.
On 10-06-2005 11:19, Java Rockx wrote:
The in memory usrloc record matches the MySQL location
table. Here is the
output from "serctl ul show"
Regards,
Paul
...Record(0xb540bf08)...
domain: 'location'
aor : '3215590000'
~~~Contact(0xb540bf68)~~~
domain : 'location'
aor : '3215590000'
Contact : 'sip:3215590000@71.9.17.51:5060'
Expires : 736
q : 0.1
Call-ID : '1846387046(a)71.9.17.51'
CSeq : 780
User-Agent: 'Unknown'
received : ''
State : CS_SYNC
Flags : 1
next : (nil)
prev : (nil)
~~~/Contact~~~~
.../Record...
On 6/10/05, Jan Janak <jan(a)iptel.org> wrote:
>
> What does serctl ul show ? Is there a difference between Flags field in
> the output for that contact and contents of the database ?
>
> Jan.
>
> On 10-06-2005 10:45, Java Rockx wrote:
> > Hi All.
> >
> > I've identified a bug in the usrloc module (I think). This can be
> > reproduced.
> >
> > When a non-NATed client registers, usrloc will write an entry to the
> MySQL
> > location table.
> >
> > If I manually change the "flags" column from 0 to 1 (which indicates
a
> NATed
> > client) and then restart SER, the next time the non-NATed client
> registers
> > and usrloc refreshes the location table it does not update the flags
> column.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Paul
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> >
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers