19 Feb
2008
19 Feb
'08
3:28 p.m.
Hi Juha,
I was digging in Stevens, for there were no restriction for setsockopt()
with SO_KEEPALIVE - do you have other info on this topic?
Regards,
Bogdan
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
This will be definitely a better solution as it
will be more efficient
from load point of view - the question is how portable (general
supported) is the TCP keepalive setting - this will need some
investigation.
TCP keepalives are not supported by all all OSes. it should not prevent
using it in those that do.
-- juha