11 Oct
2012
11 Oct
'12
3:09 p.m.
Alex Hermann writes:
1) set onreply_route to A
2) relay 1st branch
3) 1st branch times out, internal 408 is created
4) tm send CANCEL to 1st branch
5) in failure route, onreply_route is set to B
6) relay 2nd branch
7) 1st branch responds with 487, and goes into reply_route B instead of A
I think each branch should take the reply_route which was set before it got
relayed and not pick up later changes meant for other branches.
if first branch already timed out, shouldn't reply in step(7) go to
garbage pin instead?
-- juha