Hello,


On 11/8/13 10:05 AM, phillman25 wrote:
Dear List

I am trying to interconnect with a Cisco Call manager express, i am sending the INVITE message with the below format:

INVITE sip:22775019@81.21.39.153 SIP/2.0
Record-Route: <sip:81.21.38.33;lr=on;ftag=685329680;did=671.51a2>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 81.21.38.33;branch=z9hG4bKda1d.291eab1622fb619ec7df3ca647581a19.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 81.21.35.22:5060 ;branch=z9hG4bKterm-4a32-99665015-6855A22775019-37284
From: 99665015 <sip:99665015@81.21.35.22;user=phone>;tag=685329680
To: 6855A22775019 <sip:6855A22775019@81.21.38.33;user=phone>
Call-ID: 6fea2437-2d338fcf-4efc6b90-2d08@81.21.35.22
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Supported: timer
Session-Expires: 1800
Min-SE: 1800
Contact:  <sip:99665015@81.21.35.22:5060>
Allow: INVITE,ACK,PRACK,SUBSCRIBE,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,INFO,REFER,UPDATE
Max-Forwards: 69
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 528
P-hint: outbound

v=0
o=- 3099173 0 IN IP4 81.21.35.44
s=Cisco SDP 0
c=IN IP4 81.21.35.44
t=0 0
m=audio 52168 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 99 102 103 104 4 105 3 106 107 108 125 101 100
a=rtpmap:99 G.726-16/8000
a=rtpmap:102 G.726-24/8000
a=rtpmap:103 G.726-32/8000
a=rtpmap:104 G.723.1-H/8000
a=rtpmap:105 G.723.1-L/8000
a=rtpmap:106 G.729b/8000
a=rtpmap:107 G.723.1a-H/8000
a=rtpmap:108 G.723.1a-L/8000
a=rtpmap:125 G.nX64/8000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-15
a=rtpmap:100 X-NSE/8000
a=fmtp:100 192-194
a=nortpproxy:yes





The Cisco Manager Express replies by sending the TRYING message in the below format with 1 via header:


SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 81.21.38.33;branch=z9hG4bKda1d.291eab1622fb619ec7df3ca647581a19.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 81.21.35.22:5060 ;branch=z9hG4bKterm-4a32-99665015-6855A22775019-37284
From: 99665015 <sip:99665015@81.21.35.22;user=phone>;tag=685329680
To: 6855A22775019 <sip:6855A22775019@81.21.38.33;user=phone>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:24:17 GMT
Call-ID: 6fea2437-2d338fcf-4efc6b90-2d08@81.21.35.22
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Allow-Events: telephone-event
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
Content-Length: 0



Seems like Kamailio is not accepting this, is the Trying message from the client correct? Is it correct that he is sending 1 via header with 2 IP's as opposed to 2 via headers with 1 IP in each via header? Otherwise is there a solution for this?

it is ok to have two addresses in one Via header. Why do you think kamailio is not accepting it?

Cheers,
Daniel
-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28
  - more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -