3 Dec
2003
3 Dec
'03
7:17 p.m.
We have nathelper/rtpproxy/SER all on the same server. The ser.cfg must be
configured to invoke the nathelper/rtproxy functions as needed.
I cannot comment on SEMS since we don't use it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:11 PM
Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
My next questions is then, what configuration changes
do I make to the
nathelper server to make it forward requests made from the endpoints to
the
primary ser box? and how does voicemail come into play
(using sems)? Does
the nathelper server "know" about all the servers or simply does the
signaling traffic and rtp traffic get routed through the nathelper box?
Thanks a ton for all the help!
- Darren
-----Original Message-----
From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:46 AM
To: Darren Sessions
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
It works great on RedHat. We have it running now for about 4 months on
our
production servers and it has never crashed
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:16 AM
Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
must
I'm starting over on a Redhat Linux box right
now.
I'll let you know how it goes..
-----Original Message-----
From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:15 AM
To: Darren Sessions
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
Darren,
3 months ago I tried to get this to work on Solaris 8. Maxim also put
some
time into it but I was never able to get it to
compile. If you have
better
luck please let us all know.
Thanks,
Andres.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
To: "Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul" <pelinescu-onciul(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:40 AM
Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> I am having problems compiling rtpproxy on a Sun Netra 1400t with
Solaris
9.
Nathelper
> > and
> > > Portaone RTP proxy work on seperate servers with dual network cards?
> >
> > No. nathelper use unix sockets to communicate with rtprpoxy so they
root:/export/home/rtpproxy # make all
cc -o main.o -c main.c
In file included from main.c:45:
myqueue.h:40:23: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory
main.c:51:17: err.h: No such file or directory
main.c: In function `main':
main.c:486: structure has no member named `sun_len'
make: *** [main.o] Error 1
I am new to this stuff, so everyone will have to bear with me.
I can't seem to find cdefs.h or err.h. I did however throw the
Makefile.gnu
up as Makefile and uncommented the section
labeled "for Solaris".
Any help would be appreciated! :)
Thanks,
- Darren
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
[mailto:pelinescu-onciul@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:36 PM
To: Darren Sessions
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
On Dec 02, 2003 at 17:10, Darren Sessions <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
wrote:
> > Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but is the typical setup for > > be located on the same box (ser runing
nathelper and rtproxy).
> >
> > Also it is better to run/configure them on only one interface (to
avoid
> packets
with different source address than the destination of the
intial
> packet going back to the nat).
>
> >then
> > talking to another SER box doing registrations and call routing? and
the
> > > Portaone RTP taking the voice packets?
> >
> >
> > Andrei
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
>