Re: [SR-Users] Callee BYE routing issue

I’ve tested with two different UA types and same thing happens, must be a result of the B2BUA sending the alias in the To header of the invite. Example - 2020/04/10 12:31:36.851987 Proxy_IP:5060 -> NAT_Device_IP:58090 INVITE sip:399@UA1_IP:60916;rinstance=8ec7d4acf9c3436c SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:Poxy_IP;lr=on;ftag=as4220330a;did=a2c.1d81> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP Proxy_IP;branch=z9hG4bKbfa9.767ffbe5f0e31be8c27932008d28844e.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP B2BUA_IP:5160;received= B2BUA_IP;branch=z9hG4bK22bd58aa;rport=5160 Max-Forwards: 69 From: "Dan Test" <sip:398@ B2BUA_IP:5160>;tag=as4220330a To: <sip:399@UA1_IP :60916;rinstance=8ec7d4acf9c3436c;alias=NAT_Device_IP~58090~1> Contact: <sip:398@ B2BUA_IP:5160> Call-ID: 1835b7eb541743600e1b79c07615206c@ B2BUA_IP:5160 CSeq: 102 INVITE User-Agent: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 16:31:34 GMT Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer P-Asserted-Identity: "Dan Test" <sip:398@B2BUA_IP> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 566 The alias is in the contact header for the invite sent by kamailio, so everything looks fine there. Thanks, -dan *From: *sr-users &lt;sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org&gt; on behalf of Sergiu Pojoga &lt;pojogas(a)gmail.com&gt; *Reply-To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" < sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org&gt; *Date: *Friday, April 10, 2020 at 2:29 AM *To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" &lt;sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org&gt; *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] Callee BYE routing issue From: <sip:399@UA1_IP :52884;rinstance=705e0af5f4be485c;alias=NAT_Device_IP:~57808~1>;tag=64f4b712 Something wrong with the above From, no closing ">", also there's no place for *alias *in From headers. On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 1:25 AM Daniel W. Graham &lt;dan(a)cmsinter.net&gt; wrote: Have an issue with BYE routing in a lab setup, any suggestions on what I should be looking at? Topology: UA1 <-> NAT device 1 <-> Proxy1 <-> Registrar/B2BUA <-> Proxy1 <-> NAT device 1 <-> UA2 All UA to UA calls flow through B2BUA. All IP’s are public except for UA1 and UA2. -Both endpoints can call each other. -If the caller hangs up first, BYE is routed properly. -If the callee hangs up first, BYE causes proxy to send 478. On calls where BYE results in 478: if(!isdsturiset()) { ……….…………………….not executed handle_ruri_alias() } return; Example issue call: UA2 to UA1, UA1 hang-up. Apr 10 00:31:28 edgedev /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5317]: ERROR: {1 2 BYE 24dc84a4592515245177483c2a657042@B2BUA_IP:5160} *** cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[DLGURI] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=540 a=16 n=if Apr 10 00:31:28 edgedev /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5317]: ERROR: {1 2 BYE 24dc84a4592515245177483c2a657042@B2BUA_IP:5160} *** cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[DLGURI] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=532 a=24 n=isdsturiset Apr 10 00:31:28 edgedev /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5317]: ERROR: {1 2 BYE 24dc84a4592515245177483c2a657042@B2BUA_IP:5160} *** cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[DLGURI] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=540 a=2 n=return ……….. Apr 10 00:31:28 edgedev /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5317]: ERROR: {1 2 BYE 24dc84a4592515245177483c2a657042@B2BUA_IP:5160} tm [ut.h:245]: uri2dst2(): bad_uri: [sip::;transport=] Apr 10 00:31:28 edgedev /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5317]: ERROR: {1 2 BYE 24dc84a4592515245177483c2a657042@B2BUA_IP:5160} tm [t_fwd.c:1732]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches Apr 10 00:31:28 edgedev /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5317]: ERROR: {1 2 BYE 24dc84a4592515245177483c2a657042@B2BUA_IP:5160} *** cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[RELAY] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=275 a=24 n=sl_reply_error Apr 10 00:31:28 edgedev /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5317]: ERROR: {1 2 BYE 24dc84a4592515245177483c2a657042@B2BUA_IP:5160} sl [sl_funcs.c:401]: sl_reply_error(): stateless error reply used: Unresolvable destination (478/SL) Apr 10 00:31:28 edgedev /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5317]: ERROR: {1 2 BYE 24dc84a4592515245177483c2a657042@B2BUA_IP:5160} *** cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[RELAY] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=277 a=2 n=exit 2020/04/10 00:31:28.625060 NAT_Device_IP:57808 -> Proxy_IP:5060 BYE sip:398@B2BUA_IP:5160 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP UA1_IP:52884;branch=z9hG4bK-524287-1---43b5f31829f20952 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:Proxy_IP;lr=on;ftag=as78671fd9;did=b1b.a27> Contact: <sip:399@UA1_IP:52884> To: "Dan Test" <sip:398@B2BUA_IP:5160>;tag=as78671fd9 From: <sip:399@UA1_IP :52884;rinstance=705e0af5f4be485c;alias=NAT_Device_IP:~57808~1>;tag=64f4b712 Call-ID: 24dc84a4592515245177483c2a657042@B2BUA_IP:5160 CSeq: 2 BYE User-Agent: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Content-Length: 0 ######################################### For comparison, here is a BYE from another test call: *UA1 to UA2, UA1 hang-up.* This BYE was routed correctly. 2020/04/10 00:44:02.688608 NAT_Device_IP:57808 -> Proxy_IP:5060 BYE sip:398@B2BUA_IP:5160 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP UA1_IP:52884;branch=z9hG4bK-524287-1---ce36df02e8a80a48 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:Proxy_IP;lr=on;ftag=9078f232;did=49e.8c01> Contact: <sip:399@UA1_IP:52884> To: <sip:398@B2BUA_IP>;tag=as5874901f From: <sip:399@B2BUA_IP:5060>;tag=9078f232 Call-ID: 103104NGU1NjkxNGZkYmM4MzA3Y2FkMzY1OGNkZTZmMTMyZDU CSeq: 3 BYE User-Agent: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Authorization: Digest username= xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Content-Length: 0 -dan _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users