21 Oct
2014
21 Oct
'14
9:04 a.m.
Interestingly you only have 1 record in your dispatcher table. My guess was
a huge number of dispatcher records.
What do you have in that rule? Maybe some special characters?
Can you send:
mysql> select * from dispatcher;
mysql> desc dispatcher;
+-------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+-------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| id | int(10) unsigned | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment |
| setid | int(11) | NO | | 0 | |
| destination | varchar(192) | NO | | | |
| flags | int(11) | NO | | 0 | |
| priority | int(11) | NO | | 0 | |
| attrs | varchar(128) | NO | | | |
| description | varchar(64) | NO | | | |
+-------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:15 PM, 张顺通 <shuntongzhang(a)gmail.com> wrote:
mysql> desc version;
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
| table_name | varchar(32) | NO | PRI | NULL | |
| table_version | int(10) unsigned | NO | | 0 | |
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select count(*) from version;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 26 |
+----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from version;
+-----------------+---------------+
| table_name | table_version |
+-----------------+---------------+
| acc | 4 |
| acc_cdrs | 1 |
| address | 6 |
| aliases | 6 |
| dbaliases | 1 |
| dialog | 7 |
| dialog_vars | 1 |
| dialplan | 1 |
| dispatcher | 4 |
| domain | 2 |
| domain_attrs | 1 |
| grp | 2 |
| lcr_gw | 3 |
| lcr_rule | 2 |
| lcr_rule_target | 1 |
| location | 6 |
| location_attrs | 1 |
| missed_calls | 3 |
| pdt | 1 |
| re_grp | 1 |
| silo | 7 |
| speed_dial | 2 |
| subscriber | 6 |
| trusted | 5 |
| uri | 1 |
| usr_preferences | 2 |
+-----------------+---------------+
26 rows in set (0.01 sec)
mysql> select count(*) from dispatcher;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 1 |
+----------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)
# ----- dispatcher params -----
modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL)
I try local & remote db at the same time, all do not work.
2014-10-21 6:47 GMT+08:00 Gonzalo Gasca <gascagonzalo(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hi Shuntongzhang,
As Daniel mentioned we can see the error during* pkg_malloc*
db_res.c: db_new_result(112) (db_res.c#L112)
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/fcdf5f9cfff634ebfa736d7084d5e5483…
As I mentioned before can you provide the results of the query for
version table and dispatcher table. Seems to be an issue storing the results
__FUNCTION__ = "db_mysql_store_result"
#7 0x00007ffff5fd3516 in db_do_query_internal (_h=0x7ffff6cb4e78,
_k=0x7fffffffdf70, _op=0x0, _v=0x7fffffffdf40, _c=0x7fffffffdf60, _n=1,
_nc=1, _o=0x0,
_r=0x7fffffffdf38, val2str=0x7ffff6a39374 <db_mysql_val2str>,
submit_query=0x7ffff6a2825c <db_mysql_submit_query>,
store_result=0x7ffff6a2998c <db_mysql_store_result>, _l=0) at
db_query.c:137
* tmp = 32767*
off = 63
ret = 23
a) Can you provide the results for:
mysql -h localhost -P 3306 -u root -p
mysql> use kamailiodb; <Use your kamailio Db name here>
mysql>desc version;
mysql> select count(*) from version;
mysql> select * from version;
mysql> select count(*) from dispatcher;
This will help us to see how many entries in dispatcher table.
b) Can you provide dispatcher config for kamailio.cfg ?
c) Is the SQL db server local or in a remote server?
/G
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:01 AM, 张顺通 <shuntongzhang(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I install a rehl 5.7 by myself, kamailio 4.1.6
can run correctly. but it
can not run on out company's server which is also rehl 5.7. How to find the
problem.I have no idea.
anyone can help?
thks
2014-10-20 19:39 GMT+08:00 张顺通 <shuntongzhang(a)gmail.com>om>:
db_new_result->pkg_malloc(qm_malloc)->qm_find_free, func qm_find_free
return 0, can not find mem when i close memdbg.
2014-10-20 18:57 GMT+08:00 张顺通 <shuntongzhang(a)gmail.com>om>:
> rhel5
> $cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep name | cut -f2 -d: | uniq -c
> 24 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430 0 @ 2.20GHz
> rhel6
> cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep name | cut -f2 -d: | uniq -c
> 16 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
>
> not Embedded device, normal server.
>
>
> gdb
>
> (gdb) f 2
> #2 0x0000000000615b74 in qm_debug_frag (qm=0x7ffff6c55010,
> f=0x7ffff6cdcf08) at mem/q_malloc.c:161
> 161 abort();
> (gdb) p *f
> $1 = {size = 7831720, u = {nxt_free = 0x7ffff6c893f8, is_free =
> 140737333728248}, file = 0x7ffff6a4c93d "db_mysql: km_my_con.c",
> func = 0x758307 "fragm. from qm_malloc", line = 62, check =
> 4042322160}
>
>
> 2014-10-20 18:30 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
> >:
>
>> physical machine is the same? Is it standard OS installation, or
>> some customizations (e.g. custom kernel modules, etc.)? Embedded device?
>> What CPU?
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 20/10/14 12:24, 张顺通 wrote:
>>
>> os is rhel.
>> rhel6 is ok, rhel5 can not start.
>>
>> 2014-10-20 18:11 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
>> miconda(a)gmail.com>gt;:
>>
>>> What are the differences between the server that works and the one
>>> that doesn't? I mean hardware and operating system details?
>>>
>>> Checking quickly the source code and comparing with logs, it doesn't
>>> reveal any problem -- it is about allocation of the next fragment, which
>>> was not used at all before, after the one allocated previously. The only
>>> reason I can think of it right now is corrupted memory or faulty OS.
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 20/10/14 11:56, 张顺通 wrote:
>>>
>>> 4.2 have the same problem.
>>> at begin i use 4.1, i think this is a bug in 4.1; then i use 4.2
>>> to check to see if the problem is solved. problems still in.
>>>
>>> see ka_4_2_0.log
>>>
>>> ka_4_2_0.log
>>>
<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5x1TDtoeVvAckdMbDRmT3E3UjA/edit?usp=drive_web>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-10-20 17:48 GMT+08:00 张顺通 <shuntongzhang(a)gmail.com>om>:
>>>
>>>> ka.log is genrate by kamailio 4.1.6.
>>>>
>>>> 2014-10-20 17:44 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
>>>> miconda(a)gmail.com>gt;:
>>>>
>>>>> Are you using 4.1 or 4.2?
>>>>>
>>>>> Because the subject mentioned 4.2 but the version of kamailio is
>>>>> 4.1
>>>>>
>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>
>>>>> On 20/10/14 11:39, 张顺通 wrote:
>>>>> > -M 12 can not help. all config is same.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > see ka.log in attachment, kamailio version is 4.1.6
>>>>> >
>>>>> > version: kamailio 4.1.6 (x86_64/linux) 010d57
>>>>> >
>>>>> > flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS,
>>>>> > DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP,
>>>>> PKG_MALLOC,
>>>>> > DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT,
USE_DNS_CACHE,
>>>>> > USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144,
>>>>> MAX_LISTEN 16,
>>>>> > MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
>>>>> >
>>>>> > poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt,
select.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > id: 010d57
>>>>> >
>>>>> > compiled on 16:48:03 Oct 20 2014 with gcc 4.1.2
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>
>>
>