Please disregard this - further investigation showed that the SER does all correctly, it was an error in our IVR script which for some reason takes value from the To field as a DNIS.
-Maxim
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Folks,
We came over the problem with on-failure processing. In a nutshell our config looks like the following:
route { if (method == "INVITE") { rewriteuser("345678"); rewritehostport("1.1.1.1:5060"); t_on_failure("1"); t_relay(); break; }; }
failure_route[1] { rewritehostport("2.2.2.2:5060"); append_branch(); t_relay(); }
The problem is that if transaction to 1.1.1.1 fails and we are initiating another transaction to 2.2.2.2, the username part of requiest URI sent to 2.2.2.2 is original one, not "345678", as it could be expected.
Any ideas?
-Maxim
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers