11 Jan
2006
11 Jan
'06
2:29 p.m.
Hi Klaus!
Klaus Darilion wrote:
I faintly remembered this discussion, thus the question.
But I see this approach isn't RFC compliant, so maybe it's better to
forget this hack and go for a clean Path-Header solution...
Andy
I wonder if
there are known side effects if I use fix_nated_contact()
in combination with nat_flag in the registrar module instead of
fix_nated_register() to save NATed contacts?
I think the only limitation is, that the SIP client sees a modified URI
in incoming INVITE requests and in the 200 Ok responses for the REGISTER
messages. I guess most clients do not care, but AFAI remember there was
a posting that a client did not accept the 200 Ok reponse with the
modified contact.