Go for it. I'm all for keeping things simple...
cheers ----- Original Message ----- From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan@voice-system.ro To: Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at Cc: devel devel@openser.org, users openser.org users@openser.org Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 4:18:37 AM GMT-0600 Subject: [Devel] Re: [Users] Request for Discussion: MI and FIFO
Hi everybody,
are any other opinions on this matter? otherwise I will proceed with removing the old FIFO implementation.
regards, bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
IMO dropping old FIFO now is fine.
regards klaus
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi everybody,
with the adding of asynchronous reply feature in MI and MI_FIFO implementation, the transition to MI was completed - all former FIFO functions (old implementation) were ported to MI. Also all FIFO capabilities were also ported to the new MI_FIFO module.
so, currently there are two FIFO implementations:
- the old one, directly in core.
- the new one, based on MI interface.
the old implementation is obsolete (all external management will be done via MI) , so, at some point, it will be removed from OpenSER in order to maintain consistency and avoid confusion between the two implementations (as they are equivalent from user point of view - at the moment, at least).
my question is when to drop the old implementation? my personal preference will be do doing ASAP as :
- no functionality is lost
- avoid confusion among users and the explanation overhead
- it will force the testing of the new FIFO and MI
implementation, which will shorter the way to a stable form.
I would like to know also some other opinions.
regards, bogdan
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel