15 May
2015
15 May
'15
8:57 p.m.
Yes, you can send me directly, just notify here so I will look in the
global inbox, because I check it quire rarely -- I is a lot of
unsolicited emails I get there and I have filters for the mailing list,
so if no filter is selecting the email to put it in a dedicated folder,
it may take ages to look at it if I am not aware of being sent.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 15/05/15 04:51, Darren Campbell (Primar) wrote:
Thank you Daniel, is it OK to send these logs directly
to you? I'd
prefer to not disclose them to the list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla [miconda(a)gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, 12 May 2015 7:03 PM
*To:* Darren Campbell (Primar); Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch
On 12/05/15 10:06, Darren Campbell (Primar) wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
Here's the full conversation. Makes me wonder
whether the ACK needs
to go back to the same host that handled the INVITE or whether it
should be returned to the host mentioned in "c=IN IP4
PROVIDERMEDIAIP" in the 200 OK.
You still gave the conversation in one side,
towards the provider. You
need to get the traffic from caller side as well, which is listening
on 127.0.0.1, but it is important to see what that side sends and
receives. You have to grab the traffic on lo interface as well.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com