At 07:50 PM 10/4/2004, Michael Shuler wrote:
Sorry if that first line sounded snotty, I didn't
mean it that way. I
didn't read it until after I sent it. What I meant to say was thank you for
the response.
you are very welcome.
I had already been through the docs though and found
that too
but I was still seeing the following problem..
I am interestd in more feedback on load-balancers. To my knowledge, it is
a technology which has some conflicts with SIP protocol and those LBs that
try to fix the problems using built-in SIP awareness don't do necessarily
any better. We are working on a SER built-in load-balancing architecture
but that's still work in progress.
-jiri