22 Aug
2006
22 Aug
'06
7:48 p.m.
Federico Giannici wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
from failure route is safe to use since the route is protected by a lock
from TM - a transaction has only one final reply, but have several
provisional replies that can be processed in parallel.
regards,
bogdan
Hello,
On 08/21/06 11:42, Gerry wrote:
So, it shouldn't be usable in the FAILURE_ROUTEs too.
Or not?
Good question. I find this restriction very annoying, too.
Sometimes you can get around by checking the things in the forward
route and using setflag() / resetflag() / isflagset() .
Greetings, Gerry.
Federico Giannici schrieb:
this restriction comes
because the replies are not processed under
mutex, therefore the access to avps is not synchronized. We look for
a solution to this issue, since it affects other features we want to
have. Is there a reason why the avp_check() function
cannot be used in
the ONREPLY_ROUTE, while it can be used for example in the
FAILURE_ROUTE?
Using OpenSER 1.1.0 from CVS of a few days ago.