That’s what I’m wondering, even if kam-rtpengine is async, that’s won’t solve the latency problem, it will only hide it. But if that’s what he wants, go right ahead :)
RTPengine since 9.0 provided HTTP transport for control protocol messages.
you can use http_async_client as the easiest way to achieve async communication between Kamailio and RTPengine.
But this doesn't resolve the latency problem. This will only unblock workers to be able to handle other requests while waiting for rtpengine response.
Hello,
I may be grossly misunderstanding you, but how would doing async polling with RTPEngine that solve a latency problem? I’m not trying to shoot down the idea/question/request, just wondering.
David
Hi,
As suggested, I am trying to figure out how I can achieve it with async or sworker modules. Can someone help me to understand how to use those modules to achieve async connectivity?
Regards,
Miteshkumar Thakkar
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
* sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
* https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Regards,
David Villasmil
phone: +34669448337
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
* sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
* https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
* sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
* https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Regards,
David Villasmil
phone: +34669448337