15 Aug
2011
15 Aug
'11
4:04 p.m.
On Monday 15 August 2011, Nick Khamis wrote:
[..]
Alex: Nice documentation based on Kamailio! If we choose this product
it will be a perfect reference point.
Hi Nick,
was the response from Alex also on the list? I somehow missed it.
[..]
In terms of Sip Router vs. Kamailio, is it safe to say the former is a
subset of the other? I.e., both function on the same core that provide SIP
trunking, proxy and termination services, and Kamailio contains additional
features such as B2B etc...?
Both are actually the same codebase, the only difference is in packaging, some
defines and daemon/script names etc.. http://sip-router.org/releases/
But its the other way round, kamailio is a subset of sip-router.
In terms of clustering, high availability, and more
importantly load
balancing, what is offered across the board. In terms of "made to
scale" this is extremely important to us.
Especially if you look to TCP and TLS there were extensive optimizations and
refactorings recently done, e.g. have a look to this benchmark:
http://www.kamailio.org/w/2011/05/green-voip-energy-efficiency-and-performa…
With regards to the "build to scale", for example in our backend we use
Kamailio to operate services for more than 3 million customers and more than
1 billion minutes/month, so scaling and performance are of course really
important for us. Daniel will present in two weeks at the 10 year SER event in
Berlin some more interesting usage statistics, I think.
Best regards,
Henning