11 Jun
2005
11 Jun
'05
3:26 a.m.
you can either use avpops to populate the fork_list (use avp_write or
avp_load to read from db), either there is a function (not sure about
the name) in lcr module (also to read from db).
bogdan
Dmitry Isakbayev wrote:
Hi Marian,
Thank you taking the time to answer my question. The serial forking
example is exactly what I need. Is there a sample "set_fork_list()"
function that you can point me to?
Regards,
Dmitry
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marian Dumitru"
<marian.dumitru(a)voice-sistem.ro>
To: "Dmitry Isakbayev" <isakdim(a)gmail.com>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] How to execute failure_route block by the same
child process.
Hi Dimitry,
you don't need to implement anything else for serial forking - it's
already there. Take a look to this example which shows a way to do it:
http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/ar01s08.html#ex_serial_forking
about your question - no, is not possible. If you want to store some
information from main route and used in failure_route use AVPs. (see
avpops module)
http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/
regards,
Marian
Dmitry Isakbayev wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hello,
I am trying to implement sequential forking using to_on_failure and
failure_route blocks. Is there a way to configure SER or tm module
to execute the 'failure-route' blocks using the same process as was
used for executing the main route script? If it was possible, I
would not need to share state information between different SER
processes
Thank you in advance,
Dmitry
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro