you can either use avpops to populate the fork_list (use avp_write or avp_load to read from db), either there is a function (not sure about the name) in lcr module (also to read from db).
bogdan
Dmitry Isakbayev wrote:
Hi Marian,
Thank you taking the time to answer my question. The serial forking example is exactly what I need. Is there a sample "set_fork_list()" function that you can point me to?
Regards, Dmitry
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marian Dumitru" marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro To: "Dmitry Isakbayev" isakdim@gmail.com Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 6:16 AM Subject: Re: [Serusers] How to execute failure_route block by the same child process.
Hi Dimitry,
you don't need to implement anything else for serial forking - it's already there. Take a look to this example which shows a way to do it:
http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/ar01s08.html#ex_serial_forking
about your question - no, is not possible. If you want to store some information from main route and used in failure_route use AVPs. (see avpops module) http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/
regards, Marian
Dmitry Isakbayev wrote:
Hello, I am trying to implement sequential forking using to_on_failure and failure_route blocks. Is there a way to configure SER or tm module to execute the 'failure-route' blocks using the same process as was used for executing the main route script? If it was possible, I would not need to share state information between different SER processes Thank you in advance, Dmitry
-- Voice System http://www.voice-system.ro
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers