[Serusers] problems with ser+quintum gateway

Hi list, Iam useing the SER of version: ser 0.8.12-1rc6 (i386/linux) My aim is to place the calls on to the gateway iam useing the ser.cfg as follows. **************************************************** # ----------- global configuration parameters debug=8 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E) check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # ------------------------- request routing logic # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if ( msg:len > max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol record_route(); # loose-route processing if (loose_route()) { t_relay(); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") { save("location"); break; }; if (!uri=~"sip:9[1-9][0-9].*@.*") { if (method=="INVITE") { sl_send_reply("403", "Call cannot be served here"); } else if(method=="BYE") { forward(uri:host, uri:port); } else { forward(uri:host, uri:port); }; break; }; }; # forward to current uri now; use stateful forwarding; that # works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP rewritehostport("*.*.*.101:5060"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } **************************************************** i have number like 214 which has been registerd with the fxs device to our ser proxy . so when i dial the numbers like 9198495305756 which will be pstn terminated with the help of quintum gateway. i observerd the request reaching to the quintum is with the address/domain/ ip of client Ip not the server domain / ip while in the gateway we have allowed all calls coming from the our ser domain so by result of this when an invite is coming with the client ip it could not able to acess the pstn number for the first few seconds we get the message like 183 processing the call but after some time it gives the message like 486 busy and call ends. but when i allow the client ip also in my quintum gateway the call is being sucessfull established i think ser is doing the state less forwarding this is main problem iam faceing. help of people like you in this will be highly appreciated with regards ________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partner online Go to: http://yahoo.shaadi.com/india-matrimony