PS. I appear to have encountered the same deadlock problem as Savolainen
Dmitri:
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2014-November/026046.html
On 11/07/2014 04:02 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
The documentation for the htable module gives no
guidance on whether
sht_lock()/unlock() should be used in all situations when writing or
reading from the htable. Should it be?
I was under the impression (not supported by anything said in the
documentation) that read and write access to the htable is fundamentally
thread-safe, i.e. it is safe to both read and write to the htable even
if the potential exists for another worker process to do the same
concurrently.
Is that not the case? If not, should there not be strong admonitions to
use sht_lock/sht_unlock around concurrent operations--and it sounds like
nearly all useful applications of the htable are essentially concurrent?
Thanks!
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web:
http://www.evaristesys.com/,
http://www.alexbalashov.com/