That seems like an acceptable margin for the functionality. Has anyone done any stress testing of SER where most of the calls are going through the CPL module? Anyone know how much of a performance hit there would be? On a good server, how many calls do you think SER could handle doing variable timers and CPL?
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:50:49 +0100, Jan Janak jan@iptel.org wrote:
On 11-02 16:32, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU wrote:
Terry,
I was considering adding variable timer support in CPL once the tm /ser implementation of variable timers gets to a better version - I have some performance reserve regarding the current one. Also I could just add this feature and let the admin to decide to use it or not ;-)
I did some observations on a live system and performance penalty for using variable timers with current implementation was around 10% when variable timers were used by almost all subscribers. So it is noticeable, but marginal, the administrator can always disable it if in doubt.
Jan.