12 Feb
2005
12 Feb
'05
12:52 a.m.
That seems like an acceptable margin for the functionality. Has
anyone done any stress testing of SER where most of the calls are
going through the CPL module? Anyone know how much of a performance
hit there would be? On a good server, how many calls do you think SER
could handle doing variable timers and CPL?
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:50:49 +0100, Jan Janak <jan(a)iptel.org> wrote:
On 11-02 16:32, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU wrote:
Terry,
I was considering adding variable timer support in CPL once the tm /ser
implementation of variable timers gets to a better version - I have some
performance reserve regarding the current one. Also I could just add
this feature and let the admin to decide to use it or not ;-)
I did some observations on a live system and performance penalty for
using variable timers with current implementation was around 10% when
variable timers were used by almost all subscribers. So it is noticeable,
but marginal, the administrator can always disable it if in doubt.
Jan.