3 May
2013
3 May
'13
2:03 a.m.
Hello,
On 5/2/13 7:55 PM, Martin Mikkelsen wrote:
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 11:04:28AM +0200, Alex Hermann
wrote:
I don't think this is actually good. Most of operations are safe and
memcpy is optimized in all cases while memmove can imply more laborious
operations. Besides that, it is not a single place where to do this change.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, San Francisco, USA - June 24-27, 2013
* http://asipto.com/u/katu *
strncpy() must be replaced with memmove() when
src and dst (may) overlap.
You are right, it is probably better to do the copying
with memove(), then we
dont have to fixup all the transformation functions.