The record you add via rpc is creating a new contact in memory or it's
updating an existing one?
Can you dump the record after you add it over rpc and send it over to
mailing list to see what attributes it has?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/01/2017 16:25, Vik Killa wrote:
resolution update --
we found that setting
`modparam("usrloc", "db_check_update", 1)`
fix the issue by inserting missing rows on re-reg
Thanks!
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Vik Killa <vipkilla(a)gmail.com
<mailto:vipkilla@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
RPC flush is not setting the flag, but im not sure that is where
the issue is, as I stated, we are not setting any memory-only
flags with save()
But here is the flush function (FL_MEM not set)
static void ul_rpc_flush(rpc_t* rpc, void* ctx)
{
synchronize_all_udomains(0, 1);
return;
}
Any ideas?
Thanks,
/V
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Vik Killa <vipkilla(a)gmail.com
<mailto:vipkilla@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
We have tried using these flags:
save("location")
save("location", "0x00")
save("location", "0x04")
And still memory does not get flushed to DB.
I will test the RPC command.
Thanks,
/V
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
that flag is used to mark a contact for storage only in
memory. The save() function has a parameter with flags
where this kind of storage can be set. Can you check the
RPC command is setting this flag?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13/01/2017 15:06, Vik Killa wrote:
following up here
i found if we comment out a single line of code, kamcmd
ul.flush works
here is the git diff
diff --git a/src/modules/usrloc/ucontact.c
b/src/modules/usrloc/ucontact.c
index 47f3c2f..633ca81 100644
--- a/src/modules/usrloc/ucontact.c
+++ b/src/modules/usrloc/ucontact.c
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ int db_insert_ucontact(ucontact_t* _c)
int nr_cols;
if (_c->flags & FL_MEM) {
- return 0;
+ //return 0;
}
if(unlikely(_c->ruid.len<=0)) {
LM_ERR("invalid ruid for aor: %.*s\n",
I don't quite understand the logic in that code.
Does anyone have an idea of why ` if (_c->flags &
FL_MEM) {` returns?
Thanks,
/V
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Vik Killa
<vipkilla(a)gmail.com <mailto:vipkilla@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
we've noticed that the usrloc module does not "sync"
all the records from memory into the database.
I use a bash script to generate in-memory AoRs
(
http://paste.debian.net/plain/908521
<http://paste.debian.net/plain/908521>)
then i perform
kamcmd ul.flush
and no records are inserted.
We have tried various usrloc parameters but none seem
to work
Here is our basic setup
# ----- usrloc params -----
modparam("usrloc", "db_url", DBURL)
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
modparam("usrloc", "use_domain", 1)
modparam("usrloc", "timer_interval", 120)
modparam("usrloc", "timer_procs", 4)
We are using postgresql.
are we missing something?
Thanks
/V
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
<http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 -
www.kamailioworld.com
<http://www.kamailioworld.com>
_______________________________________________ SIP
Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
<http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users