15 Nov
2004
15 Nov
'04
4 p.m.
Great. I'll try it again.
Would still like to know which is the preferred method and which method can handle a
higher load
of concurrent callers.
Regards,
Pual
--- "Bruno Lopes F. Cabral" <bruno(a)openline.com.br> wrote:
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com
Hello there
Java Rockx wrote:
http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ser/sip_router/etc/nat…
Andrei,
Thanks for the info. But if I understand you're comments
correctly you're saying that either of these configurations
work *without* putting holes in the client's firewalls:
Option 1) Use nathelper and rtpproxy
Option 2) Use mediaproxy
IMHO, I'd be surprised if my config was wrong when I attempted
"Option 1" because I used nothing more than the example ser.cfg
that comes with the source distro.
I used the example config found at
My results were not good because all client side
firewalls
required specific UDP ports to be opened. I tried with the
following UA's behind a 2wire DSL router:
Grandstream ATA 486
Grandstream BudgeTone BT100
I also tested these two, and they passed here with
nathelper/rtpproxy
Cheers
!3runo
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers