On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Johansson Olle E wrote:
10 jun 2008 kl. 18.02 skrev Aymeric Moizard:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El Tuesday 10 June 2008 13:59:42 Aymeric Moizard escribió:
Stun can work even behind symmetric NAT if the stun server was running on the same socket the SIP server is running... I hope this feature will come soon!
Sure? AFAIK a symmetric NAT not only depends on the destination IP but also on the port. So unless you have a STUN server listening in all the ports available for RTP proxing you don't know if STUN will work.
Right. 1-> I'm talking about SIP and contact management. (not about RTP). In this case, the STUN server must be on the same socket as the SIP server. This is planned in 'outbound' draft from ietf.
Yes, that is something I need to fix in that "other b2bua" as well... I haven't seen this being used much, but have seen that I can enable it in Eyebeam. Going to try now. If I get disconnected from the Internet, you guys know what happened... :-)
Anyone knows any more about the outbound draft and it's progress through the IETF?
Change between last 2 versions are minor: I suspect it's very close from being complete:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=http://tools.ietf.o...
Anyway, I think it would be good to have a STUN server runing inside openser no matter this draft is out or not.
tks, Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP amsip - http://www.antisip.com osip2 - http://www.osip.org eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
/O _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users