From what I have seen, the companies are protected mainly by symmetric NAT (more secure). In residential premises, it is hard to detect, there are a lot of devices. Sometimes the STUN implementation in the clients is broken, and do not help at all to label a NAT from SIP server side.
Cheers, Daniel
On 11/19/05 01:36, Tavis P wrote:
I'm trying to find some statistics as to what the ratio of Cone vs Symmetric NAT solutions deployed in the world are, has anyone done some research into this?
I'm curious what percentage of users in certain demographics (broadband clients, for example) i can expect to be serviced using STUN alone, so i can come up with some figure to help me build out my network
Even just some anecdotal information of peoples experiences would be very useful
Tavis
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users