[SR-Users] 回复: Re: kamailio Behind nat. How Record-Route should be added ？

[cid:026313f8-1d5d-417e-81f6-d9ad8c9934a8] [cid:eadf5c29-8a04-47e3-99e9-e009a7386568] UA(192.168.0.11) received 183, then send ACK to 36.140.122.12(Kamialio public ip) not 192.168.0.2(kamailio internal ip), so Kamailio can't receive ACK. this is my config，192.168.0.11 -> Kamailio -> Other SBC(public ip) [cid:71420fb4-862a-4604-adc9-916f7c24f2b6] [https://res-h3.public.cdn.office.net/assets/mail/file-icon/png/generic_16x1… this is capture packet This question has been bothering me for a long time, help me ________________________________ 发件人: James Browne <james(a)frideo.com> 发送时间: 2023年10月2日 12:03 收件人: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> 抄送: codenot(a)msn.com <codenot(a)msn.com> 主题: Re: [SR-Users] Re: kamailio Behind nat. How Record-Route should be added ？ If you upload a packet capture, I'll look at it and try to tell you what's going wrong. This is certainly something that can work, and I always find that making a diagnosis with a packet capture is the root to the solution. It's going to be difficult for anyone to help resolve your problem without a code example, a trace, or a detailed description of the problem. If you start with a packet capture, then I'll try to help you. If you give me a sample of code, too, then it'll be easier for me. James On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 10:56, codenot--- via sr-users <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> wrote: