OK, many thanks!
The only question that I have now is why my ser doesn't make that...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Iqbal" iqbal@gigo.co.uk To: "Sebastian Kühner" skuehner@veraza.com Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 2:49 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] cancal
I stand corrected, I just checked you should get a 487
Iqbal
Sebastian Kühner wrote:
If the response of CANCEL is OK, why does the request 487 Request
Terminated
exist then?
Well, I think one more day on this and I will rewrite ser to save time...
The main problem is that ser goes into the failover route (on timeout), although I've canceled the call...
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.