Re: [SR-Users] DMQ problems

Here's another example: ``` router-0 3/3 Running 0 13m 172.22.5.94 master.alex.cloud.evox.it router-1 3/3 Running 0 13m 172.22.5.3 master.alex.cloud.evox.it router-2 3/3 Running 0 12m 172.22.5.4 master.alex.cloud.evox.it router-3 3/3 Running 0 12m 172.22.5.5 master.alex.cloud.evox.it ``` ``` root@router-0:/# kamcmd kamcmd 1.5 Copyright 2006 iptelorg GmbH This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. For details type `warranty'. kamcmd> dmq.list_nodes { host: 172.22.5.3 port: 5062 resolved_ip: 172.22.5.3 status: active last_notification: 0 local: 0 } { host: 172.22.5.4 port: 5062 resolved_ip: 172.22.5.4 status: active last_notification: 0 local: 0 } { host: 172.22.5.94 port: 5062 resolved_ip: 172.22.5.94 status: active last_notification: 0 local: 1 } ``` ``` root@router-1:/# kamcmd kamcmd 1.5 Copyright 2006 iptelorg GmbH This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. For details type `warranty'. kamcmd> dmq.list_nodes { host: 172.22.5.4 port: 5062 resolved_ip: 172.22.5.4 status: active last_notification: 0 local: 0 } { host: 172.22.5.94 port: 5062 resolved_ip: 172.22.5.94 status: active last_notification: 0 local: 0 } { host: 172.22.5.3 port: 5062 resolved_ip: 172.22.5.3 status: active last_notification: 0 local: 1 } ``` ``` root@router-2:/# kamcmd kamcmd 1.5 Copyright 2006 iptelorg GmbH This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. For details type `warranty'. kamcmd> dmq.list_nodes { host: 172.22.5.94 port: 5062 resolved_ip: 172.22.5.94 status: active last_notification: 0 local: 0 } { host: 172.22.5.3 port: 5062 resolved_ip: 172.22.5.3 status: active last_notification: 0 local: 0 } { host: 172.22.5.4 port: 5062 resolved_ip: 172.22.5.4 status: active last_notification: 0 local: 1 } ``` ``` root@router-3:/# kamcmd kamcmd 1.5 Copyright 2006 iptelorg GmbH This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. For details type `warranty'. kamcmd> dmq.list_nodes { host: 172.22.5.5 port: 5062 resolved_ip: 172.22.5.5 status: active last_notification: 0 local: 1 } ``` ``` nslookup dmq-router-service Server: 10.96.0.10 Address: 10.96.0.10#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: dmq-router-service.default.svc.cluster.local Address: 172.22.5.5 Name: dmq-router-service.default.svc.cluster.local Address: 172.22.5.4 Name: dmq-router-service.default.svc.cluster.local Address: 172.22.5.3 Name: dmq-router-service.default.svc.cluster.local Address: 10.32.68.217 Name: dmq-router-service.default.svc.cluster.local Address: 172.22.5.94 ``` There is no difference in configuration between the router nodes. -- Aleksandar Sosic mail: alex.sosic(a)evosip.cloud On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 11:42 AM Aleksandar Sosic <alex.sosic(a)evosip.cloud> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm now creating a dns record inside kubernetes with a headless

> Unfortunately I must use a busybox that will start before the kamailio > nodes so the dns record will be created before kamailio starts because > otherwise it will crash as I told you before. IMHO it will be useful > to have a flag that allows me to choose if kamailio should start even > if the notification_address of the DMQ module does not resolve. That > would allow me to start nodes, populate the dns and then slowly add > nodes to the cluster without having a busybox to do that. > > As you can see from the logs kamailio notices the busybox IP > (10.32.68.202) which obviously not being a kamailio node gives me this > errors: > ``` > 17(109) ERROR: dispatcher [dispatch.c:1910]: ds_select_dst_limit(): no > destination sets > 33(125) ERROR: dmq [notification_peer.c:596]: > notification_resp_callback_f(): deleting server sip:10.32.68.202:5061 > because of failed request > 33(125) ERROR: dmq [notification_peer.c:596]: > notification_resp_callback_f(): deleting server > sip:43.100.109.113:5061 because of failed request > ``` > Being a workaround for creating the DNS record before starting > kamailio nodes that's ok. > But notice the IP 43.100.109.113 which is not an IP that the DNS > record for the notification_address resolves: > > ``` > $ nslookup dmq-proxy-service > Server: 10.96.0.10 > Address: 10.96.0.10#53 > > Name: dmq-proxy-service.default.svc.cluster.local > Address: 172.22.5.83 > Name: dmq-proxy-service.default.svc.cluster.local > Address: 172.22.5.84 > Name: dmq-proxy-service.default.svc.cluster.local > Address: 10.32.68.202 > Name: dmq-proxy-service.default.svc.cluster.local > Address: 172.22.5.81 > Name: dmq-proxy-service.default.svc.cluster.local > Address: 172.22.5.82 > ``` > > So why is that? > > Then I noticed that on one node I do have all the other IPs: > ```kamcmd> dmq.list_nodes > { > host: 172.22.5.81 > port: 5061 > resolved_ip: 172.22.5.81 > status: active > last_notification: 0 > local: 0 > } > { > host: 172.22.5.82 > port: 5061 > resolved_ip: 172.22.5.82 > status: active > last_notification: 0 > local: 0 > } > { > host: 172.22.5.83 > port: 5061 > resolved_ip: 172.22.5.83 > status: active > last_notification: 0 > local: 0 > } > { > host: 172.22.5.84 > port: 5061 > resolved_ip: 172.22.5.84 > status: active > last_notification: 0 > local: 1 > } > ``` > > But on another one: > ``` > kamcmd> dmq.list_nodes > { > host: 172.22.5.83 > port: 5061 > resolved_ip: 172.22.5.83 > status: active > last_notification: 0 > local: 0 > } > { > host: 172.22.5.81 > port: 5061 > resolved_ip: 172.22.5.81 > status: active > last_notification: 0 > local: 0 > } > { > host: 172.22.5.82 > port: 5061 > resolved_ip: 172.22.5.82 > status: active > last_notification: 0 > local: 1 > } > ``` > I miss a node? And all the kamailio instances in this range are the > same with the same config. Also the missing node is not the ip of the > node itself but another one. > -- > Aleksandar Sosic > mail: alex.sosic(a)evosip.cloudOn Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 9:21 AM Aleksandar > Sosic <alex.sosic(a)evosip.cloud> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 12:35 PM Charles Chance > > <charles.chance(a)sipcentric.com> wrote: > > > I'll take a look - which version are you using? > > > > 5.2.0~dev6+0~20180616010152.1138+xenial > > > > Thank you! > > -- > > Aleksandar Sosic > > mail: alex.sosic(a)evosip.cloud