Hello Mojtaba,

thank you. If there is something that should be added to the kamailio.cfg for this implementation (maybe some comments) just open a pull request.

Cheers,

Henning

Hello Henning,

According the 3GPP standards, the IMPU template would be started with '+', for this reason in icscf, we have to add '+' to $rU, But in FHOSS the is not any IMPU with '+'  prefix as default. There is two way to solve this issue:

1) Add some new IMPU/IMPI according the 3GPP standards. (Be notice that IMPU would be started with '+' or ' tel).

2) Have some changes in Kamailio routing block to escape some rules.

The is no needed to have some changes in ims_icscf module.

With Best Regards.Mojtaba

On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 12:38 AM Henning Westerholt <hw@skalatan.de> wrote:

Hello Mojtaba,

Let us wait for more details from the reporter before coming to a conclusion. Without complete knowledge about the scenario there is always some guessing involved.

Cheers,

Henning

-----Original Message-----
From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org> On Behalf Of Mojtaba
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2019 8:36 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>; maryam.baghdadi@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio as ICSCF connection with FHoss

Hello Mariam,
It is worse way that you made choice. There is no needed to change any things in source code.
Just dive to kamailio.cfg file and remove "+" prefix  from $rU (IMPU) . It is very straightforward.
WIth Best Regards. Mojtaba

On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 2:55 PM Maryam Baghdadi <maryam.baghdadi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your help,
> I resolved my problem , there was a '+' in public_identity that isn't shown in pcap file and just by printing value public_identity in I_perform_location_information_request() recognized .
> I replaced  public_identity = cscf_get_public_identity_from_requri(msg) with  cscf_get_to_uri(msg, &public_identity) then recompiled ims_icscf module and my problem resolved .
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 3:07 PM Mojtaba <mespio@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> of course not, Are you sure the IMPI/IMPU in LRI/LRA message there
>> are exist exactly in HSS?
>> Or may they are changed with some prefixes like "tel uri" or "+"
>> With Regards. Mojtaba
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 2:05 PM Henning Westerholt <hw@skalatan.de> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello Maryam,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I am not an expert on the FHoss, but just some ideas how to investigate it further:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Do you get some error message in FHoss?
>> > Can you test with some other tool (maybe with a test script) that the FHoss works ok generally?
>> > Any error message from ICSCF module in the Kamailio logging?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Henning
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/
>> >
>> > Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org> On Behalf Of
>> > Maryam Baghdadi
>> > Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 10:07 AM
>> > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> > <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
>> > Subject: [SR-Users] kamailio as ICSCF connection with FHoss
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > hello,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I use Kamailio as my Icscf in IMS network .
>> >
>> > after receiving Invite Request from SCSCF to ICSCF‌, a LIR request sent from ICSCF to FHoss. User_Unknown response received in all states. I checked every thing carefully , users are registered and  defined in HSS and every configuration done . What's wrong? is it possible that icscf has problem? or it can be FHoss bug?

-- 
Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services