Hi all,
I have a question about CANCEL message processing.
My call sceraio:
When an INVITE request comes I need to rewrite a domain part of the
several headers(to, from, contact, SDP ip) according to the outgoing
interface.
I can do it before t_relay(), but when destination user has more then
one locations and they are reachable through different interfaces all
forked INVITEs will have the same domain.
To avoid that problem i have tried to move rewriting part(subst from the
textops module) to the branch_route.
Unfortunately that solution didn't helped me, because "To" header of the
outgoing CANCEL messages is wrong (unchanged. as it was at the moment
when transaction was created by the t_relay() ).
As i understood from the documentation and mailing list kamailio builds
CANCEL based on outgoing INVITE.
I did a small research and found that Kamailio really takes outgoing
INVITE from each branch (invite_transaction_cell ->
uac[b_id].request.buffer) and builds CANCEL (build_local_reparse() from
tm/t_msgbuilder.c) based on it.
But kamailio does an exception for the To header which is described below:
***cancel_branch* function (from t_cancel.c) calls
*build_local_reparse*() and fills one of the parameters with a pointer
to unmodified To header.
* build_local_reparse*() uses received To header to construct
outgoing CANCEL.
I have changed:
cancel = build_local_reparse(t, branch, &len, CANCEL, CANCEL_LEN,
&t->to, reason);
to:
cancel = build_local_reparse(t, branch, &len, CANCEL, CANCEL_LEN,
NULL, reason);
and it works for me now.
It looks like if E2E_CANCEL_HOP_BY_HOP *e2e_cancel()* (t_fwd.c) will
call *e2e_cancel_branch()* which works as i want instead of
*cancel_branch()*, but it is just my assumption.
Why does kamailio generate CANCEL requests in such a way ? Did i miss
something from the RFC3261 or kamailio documentation ?
Thanks in advance for any help !