26 Nov
2010
26 Nov
'10
12:10 a.m.
On 11/25/10 6:38 PM, marius zbihlei wrote:
On 11/25/2010 07:32 PM, dotnetdub wrote:
Are you able to test a patch if a provide one to you? I wanted to wait
for Daniel's opinion as I have no way of testing it. If you have a
dump of the attack traffic or you can generate more with bad CSEQ (as
from the message log you provided) you can test the patch against your
cfg and see if it still crashes(hope not). In my opinion the crash
should be deterministic. You will find the trivial patch attached. If
you can test it and it works I will push it to upstream (also to 3.0
branch). Keep in mind that other probles might appear as well during
the processing of the SIP messages. If a core does appear please retry
the steps in the previous mail with the new core and .so offset.
Apply the patch with the patch utility (copy to the modules/topoh and
run patch < patch) . I await some feedback :)
The patch is ok, please go ahead
and commit it.
Even if the cause for this case would be in some other place, the patch
is still good and harmless for proper formatted sip messages.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Kamailio (OpenSER) Advanced Training
Jan 24-26, 2011, Irvine, CA, USA
http://www.asipto.com
Hi Marius,
I hope this is what your after!
(gdb) add-symbol-file /lib/kamailio/modules/topoh.so
0xb7004000+0x00001d30
add symbol table from file "/lib/kamailio/modules/topoh.so" at
.text_addr = 0xb7005d30
(y or n) y
Reading symbols from /lib/kamailio/modules/topoh.so...done.
(gdb) x/s 0xb70070d9
0xb70070d9 <th_skip_msg+9>:<Address 0xb70070d9 out of bounds>
(gdb) info registers
Yes I think it is
Looking at the debug messages I see the CSeq is wrong.
But :
int th_skip_msg(sip_msg_t *msg)
{
if((get_cseq(msg)->method_id)&(METHOD_REGISTER|METHOD_PUBLISH))
return 1;
return 0;
}
As the cseq is wrong the get_cseq macro probably returns a NULL
Pointer who gets dereferenced (BANG the crash). Any other Ideas ?!
The patch is trivial ( if(!get_cseq(msg))) parse_cseq(....) )
something in this line. Daniel, What do you think ?
Marius
Thanks Marius.
Glad that we were able to find the issue.