Yes that could help, but if you're experiencing pleny of "idle" RTP
connections then you are probably not ending your media sessions with
end_media_session().
Regards,
Paul
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:33:19 -0600, Alberto Cruz <acruz(a)tekbrain.com> wrote:
If you are running RedHat 9 and Python 3.2.5 may be
this could help you:
http://www.python.org/download/download_linux.html
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Ricardo Martinez wrote:
Hello. Returning to this subject. I upgraded to the new mediaproxy version.
1.2.1, but i still have the same problem. I detected a increasing amount of
RAM memory used by mediaproxy. I don't know what's happening. Is this
something maybe related to the way i tear dow the session, i'm still confuse
with so many IDLE session in my mediaproxy. Can this be the cause of the
increasing amount of RAM memory used? Also, is there a way to debug the
mediaproxy? or something that help me to understand what's going on? Any
help would be appreciated. Thanks Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com]
Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:23 Para: Ricardo Martinez CC:
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM
resources. I'm tearing down my sessions the same way you showed in your
first email. So AFAIK, that is OK. Regards, Paul On Fri, 11 Mar 2005
16:15:38 -0400, Ricardo Martinez <rmartinez(a)redvoiss.net> wrote:
Paul, I was thinking the same, maybe that's the problem. What about the
tear down of the sessions? Thanks! Regards, Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com]
Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:09 Para: Ricardo Martinez CC:
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM
resources. Ricardo, I think the release notes on mediaproxy-1.2 say that
some resource leaks have been fixed. Perhaps you can try version 1.2
Regards, Paul On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:01:59 -0400, Ricardo Martinez
<rmartinez(a)redvoiss.net> wrote:
Hello list. I was looking the process in my SER sip-proxy with the
mediaproxy running.
Every time i look, the percetage of used RAM is increasing. It seems like
for some reason mediaproxy is not releasing the resources used in RAM. You
can look this in the next lines : PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU
%MEM TIME CPU COMMAND
1952 root 15 0 284M 266M 1628 S 0.0 26.4 19:22 0
mediaproxy.py Can someone tell me if this is a bug of mediaproxy or maybe a
missconfiguration in my ser.cfg? I want to ask a question regarding to tear
down sessions with mediaproxy
also. In my ser.cfg i have : if (loose_route()) { if (method=="BYE" ||
method=="CANCEL") { log(1, "NAT: BYE o CANCEL recibido --> terminando
la
sesion de media\n"); end_media_session(); setflag(1); }; t_relay(); break;
}; Is this ok? I think in some cases (i'm still unable to determine which
ones), SER does not tear down a mediaproxy session. You can see for example
this two session, both of them were ended, but it seems to be active even
before that. (i ommited the source, via and destination IP's in the output
of the session.py) Status Duration Codec Type Traffic
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
--- hold (2430) 40'40" G729 Audio 11.53k/29.58k/18.45k inactive 0'02"
Unknown Audio 0/0/0 Can someone tell me what's happening? I'm runnig : [root
mediaproxy]# ./mediaproxy.py --version mediaproxy.py 1.0 Thanks in advance.
Regards, Ricardo M. _______________________________________________ Serusers
mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers