Hi again,
Forgive me as I don't understand as much as you
about Ser configuration.
I still have questions:
Should I change the
configuration as you described ( authorize_message("im-rules.xml") ) ?
I am
using Eyebeam client; would that make a change for me ?
After those changes
did you succeed in receiving the Xcap authorization message/notification
?
What else should I change ?
Should I use im-rules.xml ? Should I
change something in Eyebeam client for using this file ?
You said you had
merged two configs and now you don't get the same problem. How did you merge the
configs ?
An example configuration would be very helpful to me, if you solved
the issue.
Thanks,
ilker
-----Original Message-----
From:
samuel [mailto:samu60@gmail.com]
Sent:
Tuesday, May 16, 2006 10:53 AM
To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Cc: Vaclav
Kubart; serusers@lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] PA error sending
notifies
If you are using XCAP authentication for MESSAGEs, there's a
function called authorize_message that needs to have as parameter the file name
of the IM ruleset.
For user sam, in xcap-root/im-rules/users/sam/im-rules.xml
there are the rules for this function. The XML file is similar to the
presence-rules but has important differences (correct me if I'm
wrong,
Vaclav!!!):
*it only has a blacklist parameter (no whitelist!!)
*the namespace is different (so be carefull in copy&paste from
the
presence-rules!!!) and, as Vaclav poitned out "proprietary" from
iptel.
About the structure I have: x86 debian testing. Libraries
versions I don't know exactly but the ones in the testing repository EXCEPT a
library which I had to get for serweb from the stable version...but it's not
affecting SER part.
Samuel.
2006/5/16, İlker Aktuna (Koç.
net ) <ilkera@koc.net>:
>
>
>
>
>
Hi,
>
> What did you mean by following:
>
>
>Instead of
> >>
> >> if (authorize_message("http://localhost/xcap")) {
> >
>
>there should be
> >
> >if
(authorize_message("im-rules.xml")){
>
> Btw, did you receive my
email with following questions :
>
> >> I have the same
problem with notification and other presence
> >> messages
>
with you.
> >> Can you tell me which Linux distribution you are
using Ser on ?
> >> Also please include version numbers for
libraries that are required
> >> by
> Ser.
>
>>
> >> I am trying to find similarities between yours and my
ser server.
>
> Regards,
> ilker
>
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org
> [mailto:serusers-bounces@iptel.org]
On Behalf Of samuel
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 7:13 PM
> To:
Vaclav Kubart
> Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] PA
error sending notifies
>
> Let's see if I can finish the e-mail
before gmail decides it's
> enough...:P
>
> 006/5/15, samuel
<samu60@gmail.com>:
> > Following with the
handbook...
>
> >
> > the authorize message in the
sample confgi files has as parameter
> > the xcap root while it should
have the xml file containing the auth.rules.
>
>
> Instead
of
>
> >
> > if (authorize_message("http://localhost/xcap")) {
>
>
there should be
>
> if
(authorize_message("im-rules.xml")){
>
> >
> >
>
>
> > 2006/5/15, samuel <samu60@gmail.com>:
> > >
First of all, I have to thank you for the time you spent writing
> >
> the handbook, it's really really helpfull....I wish all SER
> >
> related parts had this docs..
> > >
> > > I'll try
to get familiar with the code of the notifications and
> > > I'll
try to find something....which I don't thing so :P. I'll also
> > >
merge the two functionalities (proxy + presence) in a unique
> > >
config file to see if it works.
> > > I hope I can provide more info
these following days.
> > >
> > > About the missing
things in the presence handbook, probably the
> > > most important
is the new xcap module because in the sample config
> > > files it's
missing.
> > > Another thing is that in the XCAP structure
description, the
> > > im-rules directory is missing, which might
lead to
> > > misunderstandings. I downloaded the structure from the
iptel's ftp
> > > and inside the im-rules there were several files
corresponding to
> > > presence-rules which should be either removed
or updated with the
> > > im-rules namespaces and removing the
whitelist.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
>
> > Samuel.
> > >