Thanks for the explanation Richard! Much appreciated! Sorry I didn't read
the documentation properly....
I agree the network should be more reliable, but I will investigate if
those parameters can help me.
That's good news about the HTTP and websocket support! Looking forward to
it!
Thank you!
Kind regards!
On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 22:34, Richard Fuchs <rfuchs(a)sipwise.com> wrote:
On 02/09/2020 19.30, Patrick Wakano wrote:
Hello list,
Hope you are all well.
Under some load test simulations I've been facing cases where the command
Kamailio sends to RTPEngine times out with such message:
send_rtpp_command(): timeout waiting reply for command "" from RTP proxy
After checking RTPEngine logs, I can see the command was received and a
reply was sent, so I am thinking the reply packet could have been lost
somewhere in the network (they are in different servers). So my question
is, how resilient is the RTPEngine NG protocol to handle packet loss
situations? I saw TCP is not supported, so are there UDP retransmissions in
place to guarantee packet delivery? Any ideas to make this connection more
reliable?
The module automatically resends the command a number of times if no reply
was received within the timeout period. The modparam `rtpengine_retr` is
how many times a command is resent, and `rtpengine_tout_ms` is how long it
waits (in ms) each time for a reply.
If you don't get a reply even after multiple retries, you might have an
underlying network issue. Most often this is due to broken IP fragmentation
in the network.
We're currently working on adding HTTP and Websocket support to rtpengine,
so this could be used in the future as control protocol from Kamailio
instead of UDP, even though in a properly functioning network there's no
reason why UDP shouldn't be as reliable as TCP.
Cheers
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users