On 19 Jan 2015, at 13:57, Kalala Alexander <klistrod(a)yandex.ru> wrote:
Why, then, documentation writing about this flag
"force"?
Look at the RTPproxy module, which supports another RTP proxy.
Both modules share a history and a protocol.
/O
19.01.2015, 15:54, "Alex Balashov" <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>om>:
Correct. Not supported.
--
Sent from my BlackBerry. Please excuse errors and brevity.
From: Kalala Alexander
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 7:45 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Reply To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: [SR-Users] RTPengine
Hey there!
Have a question modulo rtpengine.
Function rtpengine_offer ([flags]):
force - instructs the RTP proxy to ignore marks inserted by another RTP proxy in transit
to indicate that the session is already goes through another proxy. Allows creating a
chain of proxies. Not supported and ignored by Sipwise rtpengine.
It is not clear, this flag "force" does not work in this module?
--
С уважением
Инженер по телекоммуникациям
Калала Александр
vel: 375291146285
life: 375256819996
skype: klistrod
VoIP Network Engineer
dCAP, CCNAVoice
Kalala Alexander
http://callcenters.by/
http://skytel.by/
http://voiplab.by/
http://asterisk-pbx.by/
,
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
С уважением
Инженер по телекоммуникациям
Калала Александр
vel: 375291146285
life: 375256819996
skype: klistrod
VoIP Network Engineer
dCAP, CCNAVoice
Kalala Alexander
http://callcenters.by/
http://skytel.by/
http://voiplab.by/
http://asterisk-pbx.by/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users