27 Jul
2004
27 Jul
'04
8:44 a.m.
Arne Scheffer wrote:
Bogdan and other who are interested,
What would you advice at present if I want to use SER and offer a forward on No Answer
feature ?
please see
http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/seruser/seruser.html#REPLYPROCESSINGSECTION
As TM and thus CPL-C does not support the timeout
(timer) option I understand it can not be used to implentent this feature.
both cpl-c and tm supports timeout feature, but it value is fixed for
all user (you cannot have custom timeout per user). You can change this
global value via tm param "fr_inv_timer".
Other options :
use SER -> asterisk (FS)
In this case all calls are sent to the FS maybe some smart thing can be done to only send
users with a no answer script.
If I want to enable PSTN forwarding + Billing I think I would then end up with the
following:
SER -> Asterisk (FS) -> SER -> Asterisk (PSTN) -> PSTN GW
Is this the only way ?
if you involve *, you also involve risk. Not to mention the complexity
of this solution.
I prefer the approach: as simple as better.
bogdan
Is there something better ?
any ideas are welcome.
regards,
Arne.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers