14 Jul
2006
14 Jul
'06
2:43 p.m.
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
not sure about this. If you do serial forking, the
reply selected to be
sent back to the UAC is only from the last serial step.
So if you have a first serial step ended with 302 and a second one ended
with 486, the 486 (if no other code is forced from script) will be sent
to the UAC.
It seems like it happens only in some special circumstances that the 302
is passed back. I'll have to dig a little bit deeper into that...
Thanks,
Andy