On 04/05/16 08:18, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 05/04/2016 02:09 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote::-) -- knowing that I tend to use clear statements, looking at the patch the expression was more or less inherited from previous version, respectively the patch removes:
the new code example doesn't do exactly like the old one
D'oh! You're right. I was careless in my analysis of that statement, and didn't see that the negation was on the outside.
It sounds like the GRUU-related commit that introduced this was
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/fd9fe6e683ca3c446daa043035072a379f9b11bb
I don't know who is to blame? ;-)
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com