13 Jan
2011
13 Jan
'11
12:39 p.m.
Hi Bernhard,
that is simply up to you. But for my production setups so far, i used
to catch 408, 5xx and 6xx.
- 408 of course, it is a timeout (others were always valid responses in my case)
- 5xx is, according to the RFC, a server failure, so that particular
server cannot process the request.
- 6xx is, according to the RFC, a global failure, a definite answer
about the destination.
Actually, if you take the RFC seriously, you should not disable based
upon a 6xx response, since if it is implemented correctly, no-one can
answer the question, not only the choosen destination. However, many
network components do not take this too seriously, so that was a valid
"failed" answer for a system
Kind regards,
Carsten
2011/1/13 Bernhard Suttner <bernhard.suttner(a)winet.ch>ch>:
Hi,
I am using the Dispatcher module to load-balance the calls to several freeswitch
servers.
On which responses within the failure_route should be a fallback to another server
(dst_next_dst())? I am sure, that on a 408 response there should be a fallback but whats
about other 4XX responses and 5XX or 6XX?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Bernhard Suttner
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Carsten Bock
Schomburgstr. 80
22767 Hamburg
Germany
Mobile +49 179 2021244
Home +49 40 34927217
Büro (Verl) +49 5246 801427
Fax +49 40 34927218
mailto:carsten@bock.info