25 Sep
2004
25 Sep
'04
11:37 p.m.
Well it kindof does and dosent. If you just want simple almost round robin
load balancing you can do the following:
In bind:
cluster.mydomain.com. 0 IN A 123.123.123.1
cluster.mydomain.com. 0 IN A 123.123.123.2
cluster.mydomain.com. 0 IN A 123.123.123.3
NOTE: The 0 is for the time to live in a DNS cache, since you want it to
load balance you should make it 0 seconds.
In ser:
rewritehostport("cluster.mydomain.com:5060");
Keep in mind that this doesn't do anything if one of the machines fails. To
deal with that use www.linux-ha.org and have the IP address moved.
----------------------------------------
Michael Shuler, C.E.O.
BitWise Communications, Inc. (CLEC) And BitWise Systems, Inc. (ISP)
682 High Point Lane
East Peoria, IL 61611
Office: (217) 585-0357
Cell: (309) 657-6365
Fax: (309) 213-3500
E-Mail: mike(a)bwsys.net
Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org
[mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Andres
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 10:39 AM
To: Henrik Pfluger
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER and SRV records
Henrik Pfluger wrote:
We would like to do failover for our backend
gateways. I though SRV
records with different priorities would be an elegant solution to
this. Does SER fully support SRV? Will it forward to the next
prioritized address in the SRV
if the high priority address does not answer?
Nope
Does it do load-balancing using the weight
entries in SRV records?
Nope.
Hopefully somebody might develop this support in the future,
Regards,
Henrik
-------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Andres
Network Admin
http://www.telesip.net
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers