18 Oct
2004
18 Oct
'04
6:05 a.m.
The problem I ran into is illustrated in another email thread. Somehow a 487
is forwarded upstream to the original caller. And it replies with an ACK
which ser won't match any transaction and thus not absorbed. Can you please
look at my other email with a subject "cancel and 487 relay" sent out
earlier today?
Thanks,
Richard
In ser.cfg,
should we just drop it in case
ser doesn't absorb it?
SER absorbs it either in t_relay if the reply was generated statefully or
even before enterint the script if reply was generated statellsy.
-jiri