27 Sep
2006
27 Sep
'06
11:18 a.m.
:-D If she really is beautiful, I would take whatever she could give...
However, this one doesn't want to talk to you. You need to find some tricks.
g-)
olivier wrote:
The beautifullest girl of the world can't give you
what she doesn't
have ;)
Thanks anyway,
Olivier
Greger V. Teigre a écrit :
Yes, I saw that. Last time I tried, it worked. I
couldn't see what
possibly is wrong from the output and still can't. Sorry.
g-)
olivier.taylor wrote:
Hi Greger,
I have tried to apply the patch to 0.9.6, see the result below :(
I have downloaded the last 0.9.6.
Olivier
Greger V. Teigre a écrit :
The patch should work for 0.9.6. AFAIK, 0.10.x
already has the
OPTIONS support.
g-)
olivier.taylor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just trying to enable the ping functionality in nathelper to send
> SIP message (i.e. OPTIONS) instead of 4-byte UDP packets
> on SER 0.9.6 and 0.10.0
>
> as shown below, patch doesn't apply
> Is there another possibility to have this feature?
>
> Olivier
>
>
> patch -p1 < nathelper_ping.patch
> Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --------------------------
> |diff -Naur -x CVS nathelper/nathelper.c nathelper_ping/nathelper.c
> |--- nathelper/nathelper.c 2006-08-16 08:45:48.000000000 +0200
> |+++ nathelper_ping/nathelper.c 2006-08-10 14:54:14.000000000 +0200
> --------------------------
> Patching file nathelper.c using Plan A...
> Hunk #1 failed at 118.
> Hunk #2 failed at 172.
> Hunk #3 failed at 193.
> Hunk #4 failed at 212.
> Hunk #5 failed at 239.
> Hunk #6 failed at 257.
> Hunk #7 failed at 267.
> Hunk #8 failed at 276.
> Hunk #9 failed at 320.
> Hunk #10 failed at 367.
> Hunk #11 failed at 1543.
> 11 out of 11 hunks failed--saving rejects to nathelper.c.rej
> Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
> T
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>