Aurelien
Daniel-Constantin Mierla a écrit :
> On 12/09/08 17:56, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 12/09/08 17:31, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aurelien Grimaud schrieb:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Fair enough.
>>>>> If no one already experienced this strange behavior, it should
>>>>> be my module ...
>>>>> I'll try to make it again without my module.
>>>>>
>>>> See my other email.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> However, in the log, after the 200 response, there is a
>>>>> cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset.
>>>>> So those timers are cleared.
>>>>>
>>>> But the problem is, that the process which handles the INVITE has
>>>> not finished yet and those (re)SETS the timer.
>>>>
>>>> @Daniel - Have you investigated the problem?
>>>>
>>> so this is the half of the issue reported via:
>>>
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2105813&g…
>>>
>> yes.
>>
>> Can it be related to other modules which register callbacks (e.g.
>> pua module or Aurelien's module?
>>
> what is the requests/second rate when the issue appears?
>
> At first look, between sending and setting retransmission timer,
> there is no much processing for the request. The callback executed
> there is in use by siptrace, are you using this module?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
>>
>>> This one got lost, but as I started to fix the other half
>>> (replying using proper mode to do retransmission), will
>>> investigate this as well ...
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>>> regards
>>>> klaus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> To investigate any further, could you point me where in the
>>>>> source the retransmission timers are cleared ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Aurelien
>>>>>
>>>>> Klaus Darilion a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it also happening WITHOUT your module?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> klaus
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aurelien Grimaud schrieb:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As a matter of fact, I already checked this.
>>>>>>> There is a reply route set before t_relay, and log outputs in
it.
>>>>>>> The log line is well seen on 180 and on 200.
>>>>>>> This does not avoid retransmission.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is a log file with much trace for a call that was
>>>>>>> answered but retransmitted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> on an INVITE, a module of mine is collecting all contacts for
>>>>>>> a serial forking.
>>>>>>> an on_reply_route is set, with a trace of mine in it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My log format is :
>>>>>>> T000 [date] [time] bin#ser#<pid>#-1 = <log>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This was on a 1 call only.
>>>>>>> I cannot figure out what is happening.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any comment is welcome.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks !
>>>>>>> Aurelien
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Klaus Darilion a écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. Not the ACK, but the 200 Ok will stop retransmission.
I
>>>>>>>> suspect that the 200 ok is not identified as belonging to
the
>>>>>>>> INVITE transaction.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Try this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. before t_relay() activate a certain reply_route
>>>>>>>> (t_on_reply("3"))
>>>>>>>> 2. put some xlog in the the default reply route
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> onreply_route {
>>>>>>>> xlog("===========================");
>>>>>>>> xlog("default reply route ...\n");
>>>>>>>> xlog("response: $$rm = $rm\n");
>>>>>>>> xlog("response: $mb\n");
>>>>>>>> xlog("===========================");
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3. put some xlog in the reply route you activated with
>>>>>>>> t_on_reply()
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> onreply_route[3] {
>>>>>>>> xlog("===========================");
>>>>>>>> xlog("reply route 3 ...\n");
>>>>>>>> xlog("response: $$rm = $rm\n");
>>>>>>>> xlog("response: $mb\n");
>>>>>>>> xlog("===========================");
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 4. watch the log output
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If both reply routes are exectued then kamailio
successfully
>>>>>>>> matched the reply to the response. If only the default
reply
>>>>>>>> route is executed then the transaction matching failed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Try only with a single call (not 1000 calls/s) first.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>>> klaus
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Aurelien Grimaud schrieb:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi, I am using kamailio 1.4.2 and testing it with
sipp.
>>>>>>>>> one sipp is client a uac (port 5066), the other is a
uas
>>>>>>>>> (port 5063).
>>>>>>>>> kamailio is using 5060.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am generating 100 calls per second for 1000 calls
and
>>>>>>>>> message were retransmitted 4 times.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here is a tcpdump of sip packets.
>>>>>>>>> Can anyone tell me why there is an INVITE
retransmission at
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.627198 though the ACK for invite was
received at
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.126096 ?
>>>>>>>>> Is there a known problem with retransmission timers
?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.120384 IP 192.168.168.33.5066 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 579
>>>>>>>>> E.._..@.@.f....!...!.....K..INVITE sip:otest@testg5
SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
127.0.0.1:5066;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest@testg5>
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp@127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70
>>>>>>>>> Expires: 180
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 188
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>>>>> m=audio 8925 RTP/AVP 8 101
>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>>>>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-11,16
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.123426 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, length: 325
>>>>>>>>> E..a..@.@.g....!...!.....M..SIP/2.0 100 Giving a try
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1;received=192.168.168.33
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest@testg5>
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>> Server: Kamailio (1.4.2-notls (i386/linux))
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.123554 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5063: SIP, length: 731
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.fZ...!...!........INVITE sip:otest@testg5
SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest@testg5>
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp@127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>> Expires: 180
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 188
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>>>>> m=audio 8925 RTP/AVP 8 101
>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>>>>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-11,16
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.123830 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 451
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.gz...!...!.......pSIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0,
SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
<sip:otest@testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.124169 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, length: 393
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.g....!...!.......6SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
<sip:otest@testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.124326 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 634
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.f....!...!.......'SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0,
SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
<sip:otest@testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 153
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>>>>> m=audio 6004 RTP/AVP 0 8
>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.124883 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, length: 581
>>>>>>>>> E..a..@.@.f....!...!.....M..SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
<sip:otest@testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:192.168.168.33:5063>
>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 153
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>>>>> m=audio 6004 RTP/AVP 0 8
>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.125532 IP 192.168.168.33.5066 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 427
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.g....!...!.......XACK
sip:192.168.168.33:5063 SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
127.0.0.1:5066;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
<sip:otest@testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp@127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.126096 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5063: SIP, length: 521
>>>>>>>>> E..%..@.@.g,...!...!........ACK
sip:192.168.168.33:5063 SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.2
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
<sip:otest@testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp@127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.627198 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5063: SIP, length: 731
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.fZ...!...!........INVITE sip:otest@testg5
SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest@testg5>
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp@127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>> Expires: 180
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 188
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>>>>> m=audio 8925 RTP/AVP 8 101
>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>>>>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-11,16
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.627677 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 474
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.gc...!...!........SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.2,
SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:otest@testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.627970 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, length: 416
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.g....!...!.......MSIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:otest@testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:39.642356 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5063: SIP, length: 731
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.fZ...!...!........INVITE sip:otest@testg5
SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest@testg5>
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp@127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>> Expires: 180
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 188
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>>>>> m=audio 8925 RTP/AVP 8 101
>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>>>>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-11,16
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:39.642587 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 474
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.gc...!...!........SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.2,
SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:otest@testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:39.643723 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, length: 416
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.g....!...!.......MSIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:otest@testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:39.797641 IP 192.168.168.33.5066 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 434
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.g....!...!......._BYE sip:127.0.0.1:5063
SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
127.0.0.1:5066;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
<sip:service@192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp@127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:39.798436 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 >
127.0.0.1.5063:
>>>>>>>>> SIP, length: 528
>>>>>>>>> E..,..@.@.P....!............BYE sip:127.0.0.1:5063
SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
<sip:service@192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp@127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:39.798535 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 394
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.g....!...!.......7SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0,
SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
<sip:service@192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:39.798814 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, length: 336
>>>>>>>>> E..l..@.@.g....!...!.....X..SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
<sip:service@192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:40.257973 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 >
127.0.0.1.5063:
>>>>>>>>> SIP, length: 528
>>>>>>>>> E..,..@.@.P....!............BYE sip:127.0.0.1:5063
SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
<sip:service@192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp@127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:40.258080 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 394
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.g....!...!.......7SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0,
SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
<sip:service@192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:41.285493 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 >
127.0.0.1.5063:
>>>>>>>>> SIP, length: 528
>>>>>>>>> E..,..@.@.P....!............BYE sip:127.0.0.1:5063
SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
<sip:service@192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp@127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:41.285593 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 394
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.g....!...!.......7SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0,
SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
<sip:service@192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:41.695686 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5063: SIP, length: 731
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.fZ...!...!........INVITE sip:otest@testg5
SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest@testg5>
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp@127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>> Expires: 180
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 188
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>>>>> m=audio 8925 RTP/AVP 8 101
>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>>>>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-11,16
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:43.338592 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 >
127.0.0.1.5063:
>>>>>>>>> SIP, length: 528
>>>>>>>>> E..,..@.@.P....!............BYE sip:127.0.0.1:5063
SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
<sip:service@192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp@127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 16:16:43.338785 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 >
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 408
>>>>>>>>> E.....@.@.g....!...!.......ESIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0,
SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>
127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: sipp
>>>>>>>>>
<sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>> To: sut
<sip:service@192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063;transport=UDP>
>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>>
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Devel mailing list
>>>> Devel(a)lists.kamailio.org
>>>>
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel(a)lists.kamailio.org
>>
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
>
>