Hi There
Yeap, ACK should be forwarded to callee. In fact, the proxy is doing
such thing. But, when it does, it puts a route at the end of ACK message.
Actually I have a "record_route()" function.
Ill try to read more about ser.cfg to find out some solution.
Thanks,
Tourinho
Andrey Kuprianov wrote:
Hi,
Sure. It should forward ACK to the callee, right? Otherwise, how can
the callee know whether the connection is established properly (i.e.
3-way handshake, unless your transport is TCP) :)
Plus, ACK is a request, isnt it? You configuration file probably has
this part somewhere at the beginning:
if(method!="REGISTER") {
record_route();
};
This means that SER will attach route headers to every request except
REGISTER.
Good luck,
Andrey.
On 11/13/06, Gustavo Passos Tourinho
<gustavo.passos.tourinho(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hey There.
I'm having a weird signaling. When the proxy receives an ACK from
caller, it puts an route at the end of packet and then forwards it.
I have no idea what i could be.
Does anyone have a clue?
Thanks in advanced,
Tourinho
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers